profile
Welcome to http://people-need-the-Lord.blogspot.com.

  • Laura! (:

  • Girl (:
    Born 27/04/1994
    RGS 2/10 2008

    About

    Really Cool! (LOL) LOVES THE LORD! in-line skating blogging IMing singing and more
    Really Boo! (LOL) HATES satan! Dislikes eatingcelery&ginger pilesofhomework and more
    Really Drool! (LOL) Hillsong CD iPodwirelessamplifier ZIGs&Tiera&Souffle&Aqualip&Popart and MANYMANYMORE

    Archives


    Tag

    Linkies

    GARY VALENCIANO lyrics
    AUSTRALIA HILLSONGS lyrics
    SONICFLOOD lyrics
    PARACHUTE BAND lyrics
    AUSTRALIA HILLSONGS lyrics
    HILLSONG UNITED lyrics
    DARLENE ZSCHECH lyrics
    HILLSONG UNITED lyrics
    HILLSONG UNITED lyrics
    AUSTRALIA HILLSONGS lyrics
    AUSTRALIA HILLSONGS lyrics
    HILLSONG UNITED lyrics
    Lookup a word or passage in the Bible



    BibleGateway.com
    Include this form on your page

    Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:15 PM

    Today

    Australian Math Competition is the only thing I can remember today. GAHH. I thought it was easy except for the MCQ about Rachel born in 2007 question. I guessed that one, didn't bother to try since I didn't know a 'method' for it. Turns out I might I gotten most questions in the OEQ wrong. xP
    I THOUGHT I got the last question right. I got 6 but most people got 5. The question was something like "Find the largest possible smallest digit of N and 7N" (N can be anything...)
    I listed out the 7 multiplication table like
    (1) 7
    (2) 14
    (3) 21
    (4) 28
    (5) 35
    (6) 42
    (7) 49
    (8) 56
    (9) 63
    After that I took the answer to be 7 (because of the NINE in 49)
    So i tried

    987
    x7
    6979
    I made up N so that the digits for both N & 7N would be 7 or above. But after doing the multiplication 6 was left behind as the 1st digit. So I tried 6 with

    998
    x7
    6986
    Actually I just realised this is unecessary since 6 has been shown to be possible using the previous product. And that it's probably the answer because 7 cannot be. I doubt, at least. I don't really 100% understand my logic now but when I discovered it I was very sure it was right. Maybe I forgot one of the criteria I thought of. Anyway, I still wonder if the answer is 5 since so many people who are PRO in math got 5. BOO. AHH. Do comment on this post if you did this question (:


    hold me now at 5:15 PM
    0 replies